Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Lung Transplantation Research Center (LTRC), National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU), Tehran, Iran

2 Tracheal Disease Research Center (TDRC), National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU), Tehran, Iran

10.21859/pmj01022

Abstract

Introduction: Regarding to ethnicity and racial complexity in socially heterogeneous and refugee-accepting countries, family approach for organ donation request from a deceased donor could be unpredictable. The problem could be settled by adherence to coordinator-donor conformity rule besides principals of donor family care. Methods: In our OPU, we have recruited a considerable quantity of organ donation coordinators (mainly medical students) with different ethnicities, dialects, and personality types. In this study, we have assessed family approach success indices in two different eras (Before 2017 and after this time). These included overall family consent and refusal rates, time interval from the first interview to actual donation, the weight of different age clusters in the donor pool and etc. Results: Considerable progress was achieved in all family approach success indices. Overall family consent rate was found to be increased from 61% in the first era to 88% in the second era (P = 0.005). The mandatory time for the coordinators to obtain family consent dropped significantly. (12.2 ± 8.6 to 6.3 ± 4.8 Hr, P = 0.02). Furthermore, the weight of precious young donors (< 40 years) increased from 36% to 47% (P = 0.05) due to more success rate in more difficult young cases. Conclusions: Appropriate recruitment of organ donation coordinators warranties more successful organ donation efforts after proper training. Decision making about suitable usage of every coordinator in a specific part of the family approach stages should be done case-by-case. This strategy could be of great benefit in ethnicity and cultural variant communities.

Keywords

1. Ghorbani F, Feizabadi M, Farzanegan R, Vaziri E, Samani S,
Lajevardi S, et al. An Investigation of Topics and Trends of
Tracheal Replacement Studies Using Co-Occurrence Analysis.
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2017;23(2):118-27. doi:
10.1089/ten.TEB.2016.0254 pmid: 27758155
2. de Perrot M, Snell GI, Babcock WD, Meyers BF, Patterson G,
Hodges TN, et al. Strategies to optimize the use of currently
available lung donors. J Heart Lung Transplant.
2004;23(10):1127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.09.010
pmid: 15477105
3. Wijdicks EF. Determining Brain Death. Continuum (Minneap
Minn). 2015;21(5 Neurocritical Care):1411-24. doi:
10.1212/CON.0000000000000221 pmid: 26426238
4. Sadegh Beigee F, Ghorbani F, Shahryari S, Mojtabaee M.
Demographic Differences Between Two 7-Year Periods of
Organ Donation in Iran: A Single-Center Experience. Exp Clin
Transplant. 2019;17(Suppl 1):242-5. doi:
10.6002/ect.MESOT2018.P106 pmid: 30777566
5. Thomson D, Bookholane H, Du Toit T, McCurdie F,
Steenkamp L, Human L, et al. Factors Influencing Deceased
Donor Consent Rates in Cape Town, South Africa.Transplantation. 2018;102:S113. doi:
10.1097/01.tp.0000542718.06826.7e
6. Mojtabaee M, Ghorbani F, Mohsenzadeh M, Beigee FS.
Update on Causes of Family Refusal for Organ Donation and
the Related Factors: Reporting the Changes Over 6 Years.
Transplant Proc. 2018;50(1):10-3. doi:
10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.11.021 pmid: 29407290
7. Shafer TJ. Improving relatives' consent to organ donation.
BMJ. 2009;338:b701. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b701 pmid:
19383729
8. Rudge CJ, Buggins E. How to increase organ donation: does
opting out have a role? Transplantation. 2012;93(2):141-4.
doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31823a2411 pmid: 22094956
9. Rithalia A, McDaid C, Suekarran S, Myers L, Sowden A.
Impact of presumed consent for organ donation on donation
rates: a systematic review. BMJ. 2009;338:a3162. doi:
10.1136/bmj.a3162 pmid: 19147479
10. Simpkin AL, Robertson LC, Barber VS, Young JD. Modifiable
factors influencing relatives' decision to offer organ donation:
systematic review. BMJ. 2009;338:b991. doi:
10.1136/bmj.b991 pmid: 19383730
11. Postel J. Simple mail transfer protocol. Inform Sci. 1982.
12. Wakefield CE, Reid J, Homewood J. Religious and ethnic
influences on willingness to donate organs and donor behavior:
an Australian perspective. Prog Transplant. 2011;21(2):161-8.
doi: 10.7182/prtr.21.2.2071rgn834573152 pmid: 21736247
13. Lam WA, McCullough LB. Influence of religious and spiritual
values on the willingness of Chinese-Americans to donate
organs for transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2000;14(5):449-
56. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2000.140502.x pmid: 11048989
14. Adekoya A, Desalu O, Onakoya J, Adeyeye O, Aderibigbe A,
Adekoya B, et al. Willingness of Nigerians to Donate a Kidney.
Nig Qt J Hosp Med. 2012;22:282-7.
15. Aghaee MA, Dehghani M, Sadeghi M, Khaleghi E. Awareness
of religious leaders’ fatwa and willingness to donate organ. Int
J Organ Transplant Med. 2015;6(4):158.
16. Huang J. The "Chinese Mode" of organ donation and
transplantation. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2017;6(4):212-4.
doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.07.08 pmid: 28848741
17. Morgan J, Hopkinson C, Hudson C, Murphy P, Gardiner D,
McGowan O, et al. The Rule of Threes: three factors that triple
the likelihood of families overriding first person consent for
organ donation in the UK. J Intensive Care Soc.
2018;19(2):101-6. doi: 10.1177/1751143717738194 pmid:
29796065
18. West R, Burr G. Why families deny consent to organ donation.
Aust Crit Care. 2002;15(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/s1036-
7314(02)80041-8
19. Hulme W, Allen J, Manara AR, Murphy PG, Gardiner D,
Poppitt E. Factors influencing the family consent rate for organ
donation in the UK. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(9):1053-63. doi:
10.1111/anae.13535 pmid: 27440055.