Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Pharmaceutical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Chemical Injuries Research Center, Systems Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Present research on herbal food-derived phenolic compounds as angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has been well-documented. Punica granatum L. (pomegranate) is considered as a wonder fruit because of its substantial pharmacological properties. In fact, in- silico studies such as molecular docking can reduce the cost of studies and avoid unnecessary experimental investigations compared to other similar models of this kind of study.
This research is conducted in-silico screening of pomegranate peel to identify potential angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Molecular docking was employed as the computational system to evaluate the interactions of six selected compounds considering antihypertensive and potential ACE inhibitory effects. Compounds were evaluated using HyperChem through molecular mechanics (MM) and parametric method 3 (PM3).
This study demonstrates the limitations of in-silico models compared to in vivo studies. The potential of P. pomegranate peel compounds as a specific inhibitor and their transformation into a modern lead compound for therapeutic design showed a strong correlation between computational models and previous clinical findings. Luteolin, in particular, exhibited significant activity and is considered a potential lead compound in drug development. Further studies should explore the similarities between the structures of leuteolin and lisinopril, as luteolin could potentially be a new lead compound and a natural ACE inhibitor.

Keywords

Main Subjects

1.Lanzarone G, Olivi M. The Prognostic Role of Cytogenetics Analysis in Philadelphia Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Medicina. 2021;57(8):813. [DOI: 10.3390/medicina57080813].
2.Yoshida K, Sanada M, Shiraishi Y, Nowak D, Nagata Y, Yamamoto R, et al. Frequent pathway mutations of splicing machinery in myelodysplasia. Nature. 2011;478(7367):64-9.
3.Lasho T, Finke C, Hanson C, Jimma T, Knudson R, Ketterling R, et al. SF3B1 mutations in primary myelofibrosis: clinical, histopathology and genetic correlates among 155 patients. Leukemia. 2012;26(5):1135-7.
4.Killick SB, Wiseman DH, Quek L, Cargo C, Culligan D, Enright H, et al. British Society for Haematology guidelines for the diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis of Adult Myelodysplastic Syndromes. British Journal of Haematology. 2021;194(2):282-93.
5.Grinfeld J, Nangalia J, Baxter E, Wedge D, Angelopoulos N, Cantrill R, et al. Classification and Personalized Prognosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1416-30.
6.Ok CY, Trowell KT, Parker KG, Moser K, Weinberg OK, Rogers HJ, et al. Chronic myeloid neoplasms harboring concomitant mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasm driver genes (JAK2/MPL/CALR) and SF3B1. Modern Pathology. 2021;34(1):20-31.
7.Bruneau J, Molina TJ. WHO classification of tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Hematopathology. 2020:501-5.
8.Rumi E, Pietra D, Pascutto C, Guglielmelli P, Martínez-Trillos A, Casetti I, et al. Clinical effect of driver mutations of JAK2, CALR, or MPL in primary myelofibrosis. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. 2014;124(7):1062-9.
9.Wong WJ, Hasserjian RP, Pinkus GS, Breyfogle LJ, Mullally A, Pozdnyakova O. JAK2, CALR, MPL and ASXL1 mutational status correlates with distinct histological features in Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. Haematologica. 2018;103(2):e63.
10.Scott LM. The JAK2 exon 12 mutations: a comprehensive review. American journal of hematology. 2011;86(8):668-76.
11.Wong R, Sun S, Wang H-Y, Broome HE, Murray S, Thorson J. In Frame Calr Exon 9 Mutations: Often Ignored but Potentially Significant. Blood. 2018;132:5480.
12.Zulkeflee RH, Zulkafli Z, Johan MF, Husin A, Islam MA, Hassan R. Clinical and laboratory features of JAK2 V617F, CALR, and MPL Mutations in Malaysian patients with classical myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021;18(14):7582.
13.Heppner J, Nguyen LT, Guo M, Naugler C, Rashid-Kolvear F. Incidence of myeloproliferative neoplasms in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. BMC research notes. 2019;12(1):1-5.
14.Kaifie A, Kirschner M, Wolf D, Maintz C, Hänel M, Gattermann N, et al. Bleeding, thrombosis, and anticoagulation in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN): analysis from the German SAL-MPN-registry. Journal of hematology & oncology. 2016;9(1):1-11.
15.Yassin MA, Taher A, Mathews V, Hou H-A, Shamsi T, Tuglular T, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasms in Asia, including Middle East, Turkey, and Algeria: epidemiological indices and treatment practice patterns from the multinational, multicenter, observational MERGE registry. Blood. 2018;132:5461.
16.Ashorobi D, Gohari P. Essential thrombocytosis. StatPearls [Internet]. 2021.
17.Belcic Mikic T, Pajic T, Sever M. CALR mutations in a cohort of JAK2 V617F negative patients with suspected myeloproliferative neoplasms. Scientific reports. 2019;9(1):1-9.
18.Loghavi S, Bueso-Ramos CE, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Young Ok C, Salim AA, Routbort MJ, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasms with calreticulin mutations exhibit distinctive morphologic features. American journal of clinical pathology. 2016;145(3):418-27.
19.Lin Y, Liu E, Sun Q, Ma J, Li Q, Cao Z, et al. The Prevalence of JAK2, MPL, and CALR mutations in Chinese patients with BCR-ABL1–negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. American journal of clinical pathology. 2015;144(1):165-71.
20.Kim BH, Cho Y-U, Bae M-H, Jang S, Seo E-J, Chi H-S, et al. JAK2 V617F, MPL, and CALR mutations in Korean patients with essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis. Journal of Korean medical science. 2015;30(7):882-8.
21.Lieu C-H, Shen Y-J, Lai W-C, Tsai W-H, Hsu H-C. Prevalence of MPL W515L/K mutations in Taiwanese patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2010;73(10):530-2.
22.Akpinar T, Hançer V, Nalçaci M, Diz-Küçükkaya R. Kronik miyeloproliferatif neoplazmlarda MPL W515L/K mutasyonlari. Turk J Hematol. 2013;30:8-12.
23.Shams SF, Ayatollahi H, Sadeghian MH, Afzalaghaee M, Shakeri S, Yazdandoust E, et al. Prevalence of MPL (W515K/L) mutations in patients with negative-JAK2 (V617F) myeloproliferative neoplasm in North-East of Iran. Iranian journal of pathology. 2018;13(4):397.
24.Rabade N, Subramanian P, Kodgule R, Raval G, Joshi S, Chaudhary S, et al. Molecular genetics of BCR-ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in India. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology. 2018;61(2):209.
25.Xia D, Hasserjian RP. Molecular testing for JAK 2, MPL, and CALR in myeloproliferative neoplasms. American Journal of Hematology. 2016;91(12):1277-80.